Note that Site 02 3 (in row 3 here) sits at the top center of Site 02 2 (immediately below)
(seems to be pretty clear evidence in the two gsd plots below that step size influences apparent gs even at gs > step size)
|
|
|
|||||||
| deformed, S1 Site 01 | deformed, S1 Site 02 | deformed, S1 Site 03 | |||||||
| deformed, S2 Site 01 | deformed, S2 Site 02 | ||||||||
| hydro, S1 Site 01 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
| scale bar=20 µm, step=1 µm | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| scale bar=20 µm, step=0.2 µm | |||||||||